pdf.chat vs PDF.ai
Unua, unuflanka, unuflanka.
PDF.ai: ~242k visits/mo · growing (the only major pure-play still up) · GPT (OpenAI) with Pinecone retrieval
PDF.ai is the only major standalone "chat with PDF" tool still growing, and it leads with an API and developer story. It is English-only and has the weakest accuracy reputation of the leaders, with billing complaints reported. pdf.chat counters with grounded, page-cited answers, free OCR, and aggressively gated localization that PDF.ai does not offer at all.
| Eblo | pdf.chat | PDF.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Default model | Claude (Sonnet 4.6 / Opus 4.8) | GPT (OpenAI + Pinecone) |
| Verifiable span-level citations | Yes, native Anthropic Citations API (Pro) | No, page-level, accuracy criticized |
| Page-level citations on the free tier | Yes | Limited |
| Free OCR for scanned PDFs | Yes, included | Limited |
| Multi-document chat | Yes | Yes |
| Public API | Yes (published per-page pricing) | Yes (headline feature) |
| Localized / translated UI | Yes (coverage-gated) | No (English only) |
| No $1 trial trap, one-click cancel | Yes | Billing complaints reported |
| Free-tier limit | 150 pages/doc, 50 questions/day | Varies (check their site) |
La konkurantaj ciferoj estas proksimuma (mezo de 2026) kaj iliaj prezoj kaj limoj ŝanĝiĝas ofte, do kontrolu aktualajn detalojn ĉe PDF.aiVidu la propran retejon de la programo antaŭ ol decidi.
Neniu aliĝo, neniu $1 provo kaptilo, unu-klako nuligi.