pdf.chat contra PDF.ai
Una comparació honesta, cara a costat.
PDF.ai: ~242k visits/mo · growing (the only major pure-play still up) · GPT (OpenAI) with Pinecone retrieval
PDF.ai is the only major standalone "chat with PDF" tool still growing, and it leads with an API and developer story. It is English-only and has the weakest accuracy reputation of the leaders, with billing complaints reported. pdf.chat counters with grounded, page-cited answers, free OCR, and aggressively gated localization that PDF.ai does not offer at all.
| Característica | pdf.chat | PDF.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Default model | Claude (Sonnet 4.6 / Opus 4.8) | GPT (OpenAI + Pinecone) |
| Verifiable span-level citations | Yes — native Anthropic Citations API (Pro) | No — page-level, accuracy criticized |
| Page-level citations on the free tier | Yes | Limited |
| Free OCR for scanned PDFs | Yes, included | Limited |
| Multi-document chat | Yes | Yes |
| Public API | Yes (published per-page pricing) | Yes (headline feature) |
| Localized / translated UI | Yes (coverage-gated) | No (English only) |
| No $1 trial trap, one-click cancel | Yes | Billing complaints reported |
| Free-tier limit | 150 pages/doc, 50 questions/day | Varies (check their site) |
Les figures de composició s'aproximan (mid- 2026) i els seus preus i límits canvien sovint entre verificació de detalls actuals PDF.aiEl lloc propi abans de decidir-ho.
Sense senyal, ni trampa de prova de $1, cancel·la un clic.